Text: Niels Krogh Søndergaard, Communications Officer, and The Carlsberg Foundation
Morten Frederiksen from The Department of Sociology and Social Work is among 38 leading established researchers within the humanities or social sciences who has received a one-year “Monograph Fellowship” from the Carlsberg Foundation.
The title of his application is Just and Unjust Worlds: The Meaning of Social Justice in China, USA and Scandinavia, and the Professor is going to use the fellowship grant to write and publish a book (monograph).
Moral principles - applied
Social Justice is a concept which concerns key issues of our time: equality, equity, solidarity, care, and inclusion. However, across nations and social groups people have different ideas about the morally appropriate level and form of social justice and who they consider responsible for ensuring social justice.
In the upcoming book Morten Frederiksen investigates these differences to uncover how people make sense of social justice and what moral principles they think justifies their personal ideal of social justice. The book will pursue the thesis that people fundamentally share moral principles of social justice but may apply these principles differently, based on cultural notions of the good society and the good life particular to a specific national or class context.
A polarized debate
Social justice is the topic of heated public debate regarding economic inequality, unequal access to education, health inequalities and sustainable development. The debate is, however, largely a conversation among political and economic elites and based in polarized, elite interests and notions of the just and good society.
What social justice means to ordinary people, how they think resources, burdens and opportunities should be distributed, and what moral principles they subscribe to, remains largely unknown.
Western, Eastern and Nordic data
The book Just and Unjust Worlds will present evidence that while popular notions of social justice may superficially differ due to cultural and institutional context, fundamental moral principles of social justice are shared across contexts.
The monograph is based on a unique mixed methods dataset integrating 280 comparative, qualitative interviews on social justice from China, USA, Denmark, and Sweden with comparative survey data on social justice attitudes from the Worlds Values Survey and the European Values Study. Interview data was collected among middle class and working-class people in two comparable, urban contexts within each country.